I never, ever, EVER call human hair "real hair." To me, my synthetic toppers and wigs are just as "real" as my human hair ones. This whole linguistic issue is more loaded than meets the eye. By calling human hair "real" and synthetic hair "fake", we perpetuate a deeply rooted marketing gimmick centered on human hair. Namely, that your hair won't look or feel "real" unless you spend as much as a used car on it. This just isn't true. (At least, it's not true as far as I am concerned.) What is true is that some women just don't like synthetic hair. It feels different to them than a human hair. That is a completely valid and justified critique. It DOES feel different! Different doesn't mean it's philosophically or physically changing properties! Different just means different. For me, you're either 100% with alternative hair or you're not. That means that (to me) it's either all "fake" or it's all "real." I choose to believe in the fantasy of great hair every day. I choose to consider all of it "real". Here are my reasons for this:\n\nAll wigs and toppers cost real money, don't they? ;)\nLook at the picture in this post. That is a Top Wave 12" by Jon Renau. This is a synthetic topper. It looks pretty real to me, how about you?\n\nI imagine that some of you may disagree and that is totally cool. I am not trying to cram my opinion down your throat. Instead, I just wanted to offer this to you as an alternative to a rather loud and prevalent theme you'll see within the online wig community. My hope is that it will provide you with something different to ponder about this subject.